GPA is the overall performance assessment mechanism of the students in the lecture system during the learning process. GPA stands for cumulative GPA. Is the cumulative value of IP (GPA), IP student achievement scores per semester, while the CPI is dikumulatifkan IP value. Assessment GPA has a scale from 0 to 4. Where the 0 is the lowest rating and 4 is the highest quality appraisals 0 = E 1 = D 2 = C 3 = B 4 = A. then multiply that value in Semester Credit Unit (SCU) subjects with a weight value; After everything is added together, then divide by the total credits taken in a semester.
I've followed the conclave deliberations BEM (Student Executive Board) at a college a few years ago, inspired by one of the students who denies any GPA requirement 3, 25 which is set according to the internal constitution of the student campus.
Exceptionable students also delivered my friend's very interesting, considering the capacity of participants to reach 50's people at the event showed high enthusiasm, plus some body president candidates highest on the internal organization of student organizations on campus are some of the cadres of internal and external college.
My friend exceptionable yangkira-issued statement about the essence of this kind, "for me, the GPA requirement was abolished, because there is no guarantee that candidates have a high GPA able to carry this organization forward and succeed and show the existence in the management later, although GPA 4.00 though, but there's a chance those with low GPA capable of doing such a thing, "he says.
After hearing the arguments the atmosphere of the room became silent for a moment and returned a debate, until the forum participants agreed that there should be a standardization of the CPI figures that students were able to demonstrate a balance GPA and organizational development. Dynamics fights perception is finally agreed figure forum GPA chairman candidate should be 3, 00 with considerations of objective and subjective.
From the above case frankly that what a friend of mine was given a contradictory perception, given the way an organization is at stake with the prospective student-led organization that will run the "government" in a college.
Not in this organization are the things that are at stake numbers on the pretext of credibility an institution, youth organizations, government agencies and companies.
But behind the above, many interesting stories to be studied, such as education requirements, social status, or character of a person. In advancing an institution, the attention of members and officers and steak holders an institution.
Given the Mind Set, academics, bureaucrats and politicians in this country need to look at the real reasons for what is experienced by many organizations from various viewpoints.
One reason for the comparison of the numbers does not necessarily guarantee success in a personal one, it is clearly visible when the power of creativity and effort from someone who shaped the real work can lead to different assumptions and assessments if the process can be carried out simultaneously, which means in practice and theory are Of course it can be very different.
So should we can understand the experience above, how many of them have a high GPA can only be a construction workers, janitors, and even turn away from what they had seen before. While other students are high GPA is not how it is able to become a businessman and a lot of new people incised achievements.
In essence, the size of the figures obtained only a subjective assessment only if it relates to the college with the ability to compete because there's only assessment in the form of communicative, argumentative, homework and exams are a little make refresifitas, so it does not produce a human being able to express what a real desire, and IPK will no longer should be a barometer to measure one's personal abilities. Well, it is definitely a high IPK does not guarantee success or the success of a person is not it?
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar